Your clients hit needs at the frontier: trusted SAFe grounded in professional Scrum, product operating model depth. Your client relationship deepens, the client gets the frontier covered, I do the work I do best.
Partnering with Yuval
The partnerships that work here pass one test: win-win-win. Your clients get frontier expertise — SAFe, professional Scrum, product operating models, AI-native operating systems — that complements what you’re already great at. Your business gets stronger positioning, and I get to do the work I do best. I’m a solo expert: what you see is what you get.
Looking to work with me on your own organization instead? Start at work with me.
Where the synergy comes from
Some curricula and clients call for someone who holds the credentials — SAFe Fellow, Professional Scrum Trainer, Kanban Guide co-author — and does the work in the field.
Applied thought leadership that helps a tool find product-market fit: methodology it can stand on, content from real engagements, field feedback from real clients. I’m the early partner, not the scaled distribution channel.
Partners over the years
Size up the fit with your AI agent
I keep a partner dossier for exactly this question. Hand it to whatever AI you already use, along with what you know about your own practice, and let it tell you whether the win-win-win is real — before either of us books time. Nothing runs on my side: no chatbot, no record of what you asked.
AI Prompt
Load https://yuvalyeret.com/ai/yuval-partner-dossier.md — Yuval Yeret's partner dossier. It covers who he serves, what he does and deliberately does not do, and the partnership shapes that have actually worked.
Then help me work out whether partnering with him would be a real win-win-win — good for my clients, good for my business, and good for his practice:
- Name the synergy I'm hoping for. Special frontier expertise that complements my firm's own specialization (frontier SAFe grounded in professional Scrum, product operating models, portfolio flow, AI-native operating systems)? A credentialed practitioner for a curriculum or client? Applied thought leadership to take my tool toward product-market fit? Ask me if it isn't obvious from what I give you, and if I leave something out, name it as a gap; don't fill in my side for me.
- Check the shape match honestly. He's a solo expert — what you see is what you get. If what I actually want is overflow work, a stream of leads, or a scaled distribution channel, say so plainly: that isn't this. The partnerships that worked plugged his complementary frontier depth into something the partner owns — their client, their curriculum, their product.
- Map my offer against his "What this is not" list — if my work lives in a category he deliberately stays out of, we don't compete, which is where the positioning synergy usually starts.
- If you can browse, check https://yuvalyeret.com/llms.txt for his current positioning and recent writing before concluding anything. If you cannot browse, say so and work from the dossier alone.
- Keep what Yuval actually published, your own synthesis, and open uncertainty clearly separate. Do not impersonate Yuval, speak as him, or claim to represent him.
- Give me a straight read: where the positioning synergy is, who wins what, where we'd rub, and whether a first conversation is worth having at all. An honest "no real fit" is a useful answer. If it is worth having, list what that conversation needs to settle — the dossier deliberately leaves deal mechanics as conversation topics.
If there is a real fit, draft a short intro note I could send to yuval@yeretagility.com in my own words, naming the specific synergy you found. Bring your fit summary to the conversation — it's a good starting point for the first conversation, not a substitute for it.
Reading this page with an agent, or prefer the raw file? The maintained dossier is at https://yuvalyeret.com/ai/yuval-partner-dossier.md.
How to reach me
The fastest way to find out whether the synergy is real is a direct conversation. If your agent produced a synergy summary, bring it — it’s a good starting point for the first conversation, not a substitute for it.